Media Kit » Try RailPrime™ Today! »
Progressive Railroading
Newsletter Sign Up
Stay updated on news, articles and information for the rail industry



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.




railPrime
View Current Digital Issue »


RAIL EMPLOYMENT & NOTICES



Rail News Home MOW

February 2017





Part 1 : IoT: The rail industry is learning to analyze data to answer specific MOW questions

Part 2 : Sidebar: Embrace data to improve safety, FRA says

Part 3 : Sidebar: Big Data - A few definitions

Part 4 : Sidebar: How to think like a data scientist

Rail News: MOW

Sidebar: Embrace data to improve safety, FRA says



advertisement

At the 2016 Big Data in Railroad Maintenance Planning conference, Gary Carr, chief of the Track Research Division of the Office of Research and Development for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), urged attendees to “embrace the data to improve safety and prevent derailments.”

FRA’s Big Data R&D projects encompass large databases of track geometry inputs, wheel force data and more, combined with image processing, neural network and machine learning technologies, Carr said.

FRA’s knowledge and skill is evolving just as the railroads are, and its projects reveal the challenges and the promise of Big Data.

“Our early neural net system memorized the track security inputs well, but it didn’t interpret the real-world data well, and it didn’t predict anything,” Carr told attendees of the conference, held Dec. 15-16, 2016, at the University of Delaware in Newark, Del. “The second version of the neural net did a good job of learning the rules associated with the data.”

In one project, FRA researchers inspected 50 miles of track. They recorded 15,000 “system recognitions” or images that resulted in 5,000 “boxed recognitions” or inspection areas to be further investigated. Analysis resulted in 500 possible “defects.” Ten of those possible defects were selected to receive additional hand tests, resulting in five hand-verified defects and five remedial actions taken. Then, a broken rail derailment occurred at the site of one of the other 500 defects identified.

Said Carr: “Now the question is: Can we modify our processes to train neural nets to get the answers we need? A training data set plus a cross-validation data set equals machine-learning algorithms that can significantly improve the process.”

Renee Bassett

previous page next page


Related Topics: