Media Kit » Try RailPrime™ Today! »
Progressive Railroading
Newsletter Sign Up
Stay updated on news, articles and information for the rail industry



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.




railPrime
View Current Digital Issue »


RAIL EMPLOYMENT & NOTICES



Rail News Home Rail Industry Trends

October 2010



Rail News: Rail Industry Trends

Passenger Rail at a Glance: Transit Trends



advertisement

The following charts reflect data gathered earlier this year by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) showing how transit agencies are addressing budget issues caused by the recession. Based on a March 2010 survey, the results show that nearly all transit agencies are suffering revenue drops, service cuts, fare increases, and staff and pay reductions, with the impacts most severe at larger agencies. Meanwhile, public transit ridership in 2009 totaled 10.2 billion —the second-highest ridership figure in more than 50 years.

Changes in Local and/or Regional Funding in Current Year

Public transit agencies rely on three primary revenue sources to fund agency operations: local/regional revenue (collected through various tax and funding structures), state revenue and transit fares. APTA survey results show that 90 percent of agencies are facing flat or declining local and/or regional funding in 2010.

"I'm not saying you need huge increases every year, but agencies do need a little because the cost of doing business goes up and labor contracts go up," says APTA Vice President for Policy Art Guzzetti. "If you're not getting any more money from an important partner, that's an equation for trouble.

graphA

 

Transit Agency Actions to Address Recession Impacts

To address budget shortfalls, 74 percent of transit agencies either had implemented service cuts or were considering service cuts as of March 2010. In addition, 73 percent of agencies either had or were going to raise fares. Almost half of all transit agencies were forced to transfer funds from capital to operations and 40 percent have drawn from reserve funds, which could have a long-term effect on the condition of agency assets, APTA said.

 

  Implemented Since
January 1, 2009,
or Approved for
Implementation
Considering
Future
Action
Implemented AND
Considering Additional
Future Action
Implemented OR
Considering for
Future Action
Service Cuts: 44% 53% 23% 74%
   Reduction in Peak-Period Service 32% 34% 10% 56%
   Elimination or Reduction in Off-Peak Service 35% 38% 11% 62%
   Reduction in Geographic Coverage of Service 15% 30% 5% 40%
Fare Increase 44% 34% 5% 73%
Fare Increase AND Service Cuts 28% 23% 4% 48%
Fare Increase OR Service Cuts 59% 61% 36% 84%
Transfer of Funds from Capital Use to Operations 49% 18% 13% 54%
Use of Reserves 40% 23% 7% 56%

 

Changes in State Funding in Current Year

In total, 89 percent of the agencies that responded to APTA's survey said they are facing flat or declining state revenue. Larger agencies — those that provide more than 25 million annual trips — are facing a higher proportion of declines in state and local revenue. As a result, 54 percent of large transit agencies have cut peak-period service and 31 percent have reduced the geographic coverage of service, according to APTA. In addition, almost seven in 10 have transferred funds from capital to operations and 54 percent have been forced to dip into agency funding reserves.

graphB

 

Changes in Fare Revenue in Current Year

Many transit agencies have addressed declining revenue, in part, by increasing fares. However, with unemployment levels lingering around 10 percent, fewer people have been going to work, resulting in less farebox revenue, says APTA Vice President for Policy Art Guzzetti.

graphC

Agency Personnel Actions to Address Recession Impacts

In APTA's March 2010 survey, more than half of the responding transit agencies reported a reduction in the number of positions, either through attrition or layoffs. About one in three agencies had laid off workers. Seven agencies had laid off 100 or more employees and of those, four had more than 250 layoffs. Staff cuts were most common at larger transit agencies, with 80 percent reducing positions and 57 percent laying off workers. Agencies also reduced salaries and employee benefits in an effort to help balance their budgets.

  Implemented Since
January 1, 2009,
or Approved for
Implementation
Considering
Future
Action
Implemented AND
Considering Additional
Future Action
Implemented OR
Considering for
Future Action
Hiring Freeze 41% 18% 5% 54%
Furloughs: Non-Union 23% 16% 3% 36%
Furloughs: Union 11% 15% 1% 25%
Salary Freeze or Reduction: Non-Union 52% 20% 9% 62%
Salary Freeze or Reduction: Union 23% 22% 3% 42%
Reduction in Benefits: Non-Union 25% 25% 4% 46%
Reduction in Benefits: Union 17% 25% 3% 38%
Reduction in Positions 53% 30% 15% 68%
Layoffs 32% 22% 7% 47%


Related Topics: