Newsletter Sign Up
Stay updated on news, articles and information for the rail industry
Stay updated on news, articles and information for the rail industry
RAIL EMPLOYMENT & NOTICES
Rail News Home
Rail Industry Trends
Rail News: Rail Industry Trends
6/15/2009
Rail News: Rail Industry Trends
BLET and UTU to FRA: Ban one-man crews
advertisement
Last week, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) and United Transportation Union (UTU) jointly filed a petition with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking an emergency order to prohibit one-person crews, including workers involved in conventional and remote-control yard switching operations.
Although collective bargaining agreements require at least one conductor on each train start, there are no federal safety regulations prohibiting one-person crews in yard or road operations, the unions claim.
"The evidence shows that no conditions exist where a lone engineer or remote control operations are safe," BLET and UTU officials said in the petition.
The unions point to a May 10 accident at CSX Transportation’s Selkirk, N.Y., yard as an example. The incident resulted in the death of a UTU-represented conductor, who was working alone and using a remote-control device, according to the BLET and UTU.
"The workload associated with [remote-control operations], while performing other safety critical tasks, demands too much of a single individual, including loss of situational awareness," union officials said in the petition.
The BLET and UTU also question the FRA’s conclusions that the safety records of remote-control and conventional operations essentially are the same.
“It is time for the FRA to take a proactive safety stance, and not merely a band-aid reactive approach to this issue,” union officials said in the petition.
Although collective bargaining agreements require at least one conductor on each train start, there are no federal safety regulations prohibiting one-person crews in yard or road operations, the unions claim.
"The evidence shows that no conditions exist where a lone engineer or remote control operations are safe," BLET and UTU officials said in the petition.
The unions point to a May 10 accident at CSX Transportation’s Selkirk, N.Y., yard as an example. The incident resulted in the death of a UTU-represented conductor, who was working alone and using a remote-control device, according to the BLET and UTU.
"The workload associated with [remote-control operations], while performing other safety critical tasks, demands too much of a single individual, including loss of situational awareness," union officials said in the petition.
The BLET and UTU also question the FRA’s conclusions that the safety records of remote-control and conventional operations essentially are the same.
“It is time for the FRA to take a proactive safety stance, and not merely a band-aid reactive approach to this issue,” union officials said in the petition.